Home / Insights / Safety & protection

Safety & protection3 min readLast updated September 2026

Radionuclide laboratory type A, B or C: what drives the classification – and what it triggers in construction

The statement “We work with radioactivity, so we need a type A laboratory” is usually wrong: the type of working area follows from the activity in relation to the nuclide-specific licensing limit. And it determines fire protection, ventilation, plumbing and floor plan all at once.

Key points

  • What counts is the activity per operation or per day, expressed in multiples of the licensing limit LA – not the annual quantity and not the highest becquerel figure.
  • The licensing limit reflects the hazard on inhalation: for alpha emitters it is orders of magnitude lower, so even small activities push the classification upwards.
  • Working area type, controlled area and person category are three different classifications, which must be shown separately in the project.
  • The type sets minimum requirements across all trades – the decision between A and B changes fire resistance, ventilation, emergency power, access and waste water at the same time.

01The classification follows a calculation, not a label

Anyone working with unsealed radioactive sources above the licensing limit requires a working area under the Radiological Protection Ordinance (RPO): a separate room reserved solely for this purpose within a controlled area. Art. 81 RPO classifies it according to the activity handled per operation or per day – measured in multiples of the nuclide-specific licensing limit LA from Annex 3.

  • Type C – 1 to 100 LA
  • Type B – 1 to 10 000 LA
  • Type A – from 1 LA up to an upper limit defined in the licensing procedure

For storage, the supervisory authority may increase the values by up to a factor of 100; for handling operations with a low risk of incorporation, exceptionally by up to a factor of 10.

02The fallacy: counting becquerels

The licensing limit is fundamentally set such that a single inhalation of this activity results in a committed effective dose of 5 mSv. It therefore reflects how hazardous a nuclide is inside the body – and this differs by orders of magnitude.

Fictitious example, 100 MBq each, in multiples of the authorisation limit under RPO Annex 3: fluorine-18 1.4, actinium-225 125 000 – depending on the nuclide, the same activity lies just above the authorisation limit or far into the type A range.FICTITIOUS EXAMPLE · 100 MBq EACH IN MULTIPLES OF THE AUTHORISATION LIMITType C, B or Aup to 100 LAType B or Aup to 10 000 LAType Aabovebelow1 LA0.1110100100010 000100 0001 mnMultiples of the authorisation limit LA (logarithmic)Fluorine-18LA 70 MBq1.4Actinium-225LA 800 Bq125 000
Same activity, completely different classification Calculation example; licensing limits according to RPO Annex 3, column 10

800 Bqlicensing limit for actinium-225 – compared with 70 MBq for fluorine-18

One hundred megabecquerels of a short-lived PET nuclide lie just above the licensing limit; for an alpha emitter, the same activity corresponds to a hundred thousand times the limit. For the positron emitter, shielding against external radiation is the priority; for the alpha emitter, incorporation. If several nuclides are handled, their combined effect must be clarified with the supervisory authority. What matters, therefore, is not the largest number, but the most demanding nuclide in relation to its limit.

03Three classifications that do not mean the same thing

The working area type describes the room. The controlled or supervised area governs access and monitoring – every working area is at the same time a controlled area. Persons, in turn, are classified by the enterprise into categories A or B according to the possible annual dose. A type A laboratory and a category A person have nothing in common except the letter.

04What the type triggers in construction

The FDHA Ordinance on the Handling of Radioactive Material (UraM) sets minimum requirements for each type – not for each trade. Every working area is a separate fire compartment. A single decision therefore shifts several trades at once.

Selection of structural requirements under UraM Annex 5: fire resistance of 90, 60 and 30 minutes for types A, B and C; fire dampers, ventilation system with at least 5 air changes and negative pressure for A and B; negative pressure after a power failure as well as a changing room with decontamination shower and waste water monitoring system for type A.WHAT THE TYPE REQUIRES STRUCTURALLY – SELECTIONType AType BType CFire resistance of floor, walls, ceilings90 min60 min30 minFire resistance of doors, internal windows60 min30 min30 minFire dampers in supply and exhaust airVentilation system, min. 5 air changes per hourNegative pressure relative to adjacent roomsNegative pressure even after mains power failureChanging room with decontamination showerClothing change pointWaste water monitoring systemon requeston request● = required · Type C: ventilation system if an external window does not provide sufficient ventilation
Minimum requirements by working area type UraM, SR 814.554, Annex 5 and Art. 24

05What this means for your project

  • Determine the activity per nuclide and room per operation, separately for storage and handling – not the annual quantity
  • Define the type for each room early and agree it with the supervisory authority: FOPH for medicine, research and teaching, Suva for industry and trade
  • Show the working area type, controlled area and person category separately
  • Clarify the consequences for each trade before the preliminary design: fire compartments, ventilation and negative pressure, access, waste water, decay storage
  • Involve radiological protection experts early

Deriving the classification properly avoids both: an oversized type A laboratory – and an under-planned type B laboratory that has to be retrofitted during the licensing procedure.

Takeaway

It is not the label “radioactive” that determines the laboratory, but the activity in relation to the licensing limit – and each type leaves its mark on every trade.

Standards and sources

  • Radiological Protection Ordinance (RPO, SR 814.501), in particular Art. 51, 52, 80, 81, 184 and Annex 3
  • FDHA Ordinance on the Handling of Radioactive Material (UraM, SR 814.554), in particular Art. 10–18, 24–25, Annexes 3, 5 and 6
  • Radiological Protection Act (RPA, SR 814.50)
  • VKF/AEAI fire protection standards – fire resistance EI/REI
  • Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) – supervision and guidance on radiological protection

SEDC AG · Article from our internal training series “Technik Praxis”, abridged for clients and users.

Full version & expert discussion

More depth for your project.

The full version contains the classification calculation for several nuclides and activities, the complete requirements matrix by working area type and trade with the interfaces, and our checklist for the room schedule and licensing documents. We are happy to go through it with you – applied to your installation.

Request an expert discussion